Restaurants

Kitchen display or printer: when a screen is worth it

A screen times and routes tickets and cannot jam. Paper survives anything and cannot be bumped by accident. Why most kitchens end up running both.

Every restaurant that has ever had a printer jam during a rush has wondered about a screen instead. It is a reasonable thing to want, and the case for it is narrower than the people selling them suggest.

Here is what a kitchen display system actually changes, and when paper is still the right answer.

What a screen does that paper cannot

It cannot run out or jam. The printer failure in the middle of a Saturday is the reason most kitchens start looking. No paper, no ribbon, no heat-fade, no curled roll under the pass.

Tickets can change after they are sent. A table adds a side, a modifier is corrected, a cover is cancelled. On paper that is a second ticket and a shout. On a screen the existing ticket updates, which removes an entire class of mistake.

It times everything. A screen knows how long a ticket has been open, so it can colour it as it ages. That is the single most useful thing about it: the pass can see at a glance which ticket is in trouble.

It can route intelligently. The same order appears differently at grill, cold and dessert, each station seeing only its own items but knowing the whole order has to land together.

It produces real data. Ticket times by item, by station, by hour, by day. If you have ever argued about whether the kitchen is slow or the floor is ringing in badly, this is the number that settles it.

What paper does that a screen cannot

Not a short list, and it is why plenty of very good kitchens still print.

It survives anything. Water, flour, heat, being stuck to a rail with a magnet, being written on. A screen in a hot wet kitchen is a device with a lifespan.

It is physical. A ticket on a rail is a position in a queue you can reorder with your hands. Some chefs work by moving paper, and asking them to work by tapping a screen is asking them to change how they think during service.

It cannot be tapped by accident. Bumping a ticket you did not mean to bump is a real failure mode and it is worse than a jam, because a jam is obvious and a wrongly-bumped ticket silently disappears.

It costs almost nothing. A printer is cheap and replaceable. Screens, mounts, and the fact that a kitchen screen will eventually die of grease are all real money.

The hybrid nearly everyone ends up with

Screens where timing and routing matter, paper where robustness matters.

A common arrangement is screens at the pass and on the line, and a printer that still produces a ticket for anything leaving the building — takeaway, delivery, collection — because a bag needs something physical attached to it.

That is not a compromise, it is the correct answer. The expediter needs timing. The bag needs a label.

What actually makes it work or fail

Every kitchen display failure we have seen comes down to one of four things.

Bump discipline. A ticket is bumped when the food leaves, not when it is started and not when the chef notices the screen. If bumping is sloppy the timing data is fiction, and the timing data was the reason you bought it.

Station routing set up properly. Items have to be assigned to stations, every item, including the ones added later. An unassigned item appears nowhere, which is a dish that never gets made.

Somebody watching the ages. The colours only help if a person is looking. In a busy kitchen that is the expediter's job and it needs to be their job explicitly.

A plan for when it dies. It will, mid-service, at least once. Know whether you have a printer to fall back on and whether anyone knows how to switch to it. A kitchen with no fallback and a dead screen is a kitchen taking orders on paper napkins.

The report worth having

If you get one thing out of a screen, get ticket times by hour.

Almost every restaurant believes its kitchen slows down when it gets busy. Some do. Some have a kitchen that is fine and a floor that rings in five tables at once because the section was seated in one go. Those two problems have opposite fixes and they look identical from the dining room.

Ticket times by hour, next to covers by hour, tells you which one you have. It is also the number to look at after any menu change, because a new dish that takes ninety seconds longer than the one it replaced will quietly wreck your Saturday.

Whether you need one

Worth it if: you run more than about forty covers a service, you have multiple stations that need to coordinate, your printer has failed during service more than once, or you genuinely do not know your ticket times.

Not worth it yet if: one station does most of the work, volume is modest, and the current system is not actually failing. A screen will not make a kitchen faster. It makes a kitchen's timing visible, and visible timing is what lets you make it faster.

← More insights

Keep reading

Restaurants

Large party bookings by phone: what to ask, and what not to

3 min read

An eight-top is your most valuable booking and the easiest to lose on the phone. The five questions that matter, and why you should not ask for every guest's details.

SalonsRestaurants

The card fee on a tip, and who pays it

3 min read

When a client tips by card, you pay processing on the tip too. What it costs a year, whether you can pass it on, and the split-payment mistake that files tips against the wrong card.